Bringing Safe Drinking Water to India
Author
Shirish Kardile - KConsultation
KConsultation
Current Issue
Issue
5
Parent Article

In India, drinking water systems work only intermittently in the majority of the country. And even when they run, their products can contain concerning contaminants. Progress in providing a safe source to something so fundamental is stifled by a cumbersome management system, subject to state jurisdiction. About 80-90 percent of drinking water is supplied by state governments.

In this system, management is almost completely dominated by state-run organizations and statutory bodies. The bodies are owners and operators of the water supply schemes. Maharashtra is the only state which has given autonomy to local bodies to own and operate their local water supply systems. Throughout India, there can also be found large municipal corporations that own their water supply and sewerage systems.

At the central government level, there are three ministries responsible for drinking water management. The most important is CPHEEO, the Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization. It forms the policies and guidelines transmitted to the states for program execution. It also controls funding disbursements, loans, and aid.

The majority of the funding for the schemes comes from the central government, and the state governments add money. Sometimes the local bodies have to pick up their share too. Assistance also comes from the national and international lenders.

After 75 years of India’s independence, the drinking water sector remains plagued by two problems.

First, come March to June, there is a scarcity of drinking water. This could be largely attributed to natural (geographically rain-deficient areas) and artificial (unequitable distribution of water) causes. And as mentioned outages occur all the time.

Second, and equally serious, is the unsatisfactory quality of drinking water at the consumer end. The continuous deterioration in water quality poses serious challenges. The mortality rate for children under five in India is very high, one of the reasons being the poor water quality. As far as health aspects of water are concerned, India stands lowly at 95 among 140 countries, almost at par with sub-Saharan nations.

The continuous neglect of this sector has many reasons. However, the main reason is the general apathy toward public health and lack of priority of our elected representatives. Since independence, in the parliament there have been fierce debates on the quality of colas but not a single debate on quality of drinking water.

The issue of unsatisfactory water quality can be tackled effectively by enacting laws and implementing regulations. The governments also need to invest in capital cost for building the infrastructure. However, they have failed to create an effective management structure for operation and maintenance. And the ownership structure of schemes and projects does not ensure accountability to consumers.

Is it time that India enact legislation like the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act? Like the United States, India too has a three-tier water management structure, with the involvement of central and state governments and local bodies. However, the management structure has to be suitably mandated to ensure responsibility. The central government through CPHEEO should form the policies and guidelines on drinking water quality. The state governments and their agencies should be regulatory authorities. And finally it should be the responsibility of local bodies that they operate their systems effectively.

Success in delivering quality drinking water under a suitable regulatory structure ultimately depends on accountability. A satisfied consumer will not hesitate to pay a water tariff. Over a reasonable period of time, well-managed systems will become self sustaining.

Improved water quality will not only enhance the productivity of India as a nation but the quality of life for all Indians — the ultimate goal of our existence in a democratic world.

International Conspiracy Promotes Sustainability Along With Equity
Author
Bruce Rich - Environmental Law Institute
Environmental Law Institute
Current Issue
Issue
2
Bruce Rich

Last February 13, the Indian government arrested in the southern city of Bengalaru (Bangalore) an apparently highly dangerous young woman. Security forces extradited her immediately to Delhi to appear before a court the very next day. Police alleged that 21-year-old Disha Ravi contributed to a coordinated international conspiracy “to wage economic, social, cultural, and regional war against India.”

Ravi co-founded in 2019 the Indian branch of Greta Thunberg’s climate protest movement, Fridays for Future. Over the past three years Ravi has been involved in campaigns to protect the endangered lion-tailed macaque, delay a dubiously planned hydroelectric dam, and protest the proposed weakening of India’s environmental assessment law.

Early in February Thunberg tweeted her support for hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers protesting since last year recent market liberalization laws for agriculture. The tweet included a toolkit that explained the farmers’ protest, listing various typical civil society nonviolent tactics, such as tweeting, email alerts, pressure on parliamentarians in the home countries of activists to raise questions with the Indian government, etc. Ravi edited several sentences in Thunberg’s draft of the toolkit, to clarify the farmers’ issues. Obviously a dangerous international conspiracy.

India is one of several major democratic countries, such as Turkey and Brazil, where nationalistic strongmen have come to power, all claiming to make their countries great (again). Attacking journalists, suppressing nongovernmental environmental, human rights, and social justice organizations, weakening and non-enforcement of laws ensuring public participation and transparency (such as environmental assessment) are all part of their toolkit.

Ravi was arrested under a British colonial 1870s sedition act (still on the books!) that provides up to life imprisonment for any “words, signs, or representations” that “attempt to incite disaffection toward the government.” She is in good company. The British Raj arrested Gandhi under the same law, which the Mahatma, who was also a lawyer, said “was designed to suppress the liberty of the citizen.”

In summer 2020, Ravi was one of the leaders of a nationwide protest against a draft revision of India’s environmental assessment law. The leading English language daily The Hindu condemned the draft for going “to great lengths to reduce or even remove public participation, and by extension expert opinion,” from the environmental approval process.

The draft includes a list of projects that would no longer require environmental clearance, including coal mining and seismic surveys for oil, methane, and gas on some lands. It limits public participation in reviewing pipeline infrastructure in national parks and wildlife sanctuaries, as well as relaxing environmental rules for roads and highways. During the public comment period three environmental groups — Fridays for Future, Let India Breathe, and There Is No Earth B — helped mobilize over two million protest emails from Indian citizens to the environment ministry. In response the government shut down the web sites of the organizations for weeks and threatened to arrest environmentalists under anti-terrorism laws.

Ravi recounts that her family and many others in India are already suffering from the effects of climate change. The granddaughter of farmers, she sympathizes with their plight. Farmers account for 58 percent of India’s 1.3 billion people. They suffer from increased climate extremes of drought and flooding, as well as from the economic threat of rapid market liberalization of agriculture, which they maintain will dispossess them and benefit large agribusinesses. “Instead of being supported to become self-reliant and prosperous,” Thunberg wrote, “a majority . . . are increasingly being subjected to the control of large corporations and international institutions whose sole focus is profits, and necessarily involves increased exploitation of nature.”

Thunberg’s and Ravi’s message links environmental sustainability, climate action, and broadened political and economic democracy. It appears to be a threat for some nationalistic governments. Yet India needs these activists for a sustainable future. The 2020 Yale-Columbia Environmental Performance Index, which examines 180 nations on environmental health and ecosystem vitality according to 32 performance indicators, ranked India at 168, near the bottom. India’s air quality ranks 179 (only Pakistan’s is lower), and 42 of its major rivers are so contaminated with heavy metals that they threaten human health.

Ravi was released on bail following a deluge of protests from prominent Indian academics and political figures, including diplomats, former finance and environment ministers, and the economist and author Mihir Sharma, who tweeted “Ok now we’re arresting 21-year-old climate activists. Well done India, you big superpower you.”

International Conspiracy Promotes Sustainability Along With Equity.