The Environmental Forum

Volume 41 Issue 5

September-October 2024

This issue's articles are available below.

ELI Members may login to read and download current and past issues of the Forum.
Not a member? Join now!


fish

OPENING ARGUMENT The actions needed to reverse the tide of marine environmental decline are many. We can start by fully protecting at least 30 percent of the ocean by 2030—before we reach tipping points that may lead to a wholesale change in the structure and function of ecosystems.

By Kathryn Mengerink
Waitt Institute

With SIDEBARs from Oceano Azul Foundation and Natural Resources Defense Council

Cumulative Risks

ASSAY Solutions must be found within existing legal frameworks. This means bringing scientific evidence together with the art of policy through an interdisciplinary approach and with input from impacted communities.

By Jan-Mitchell Archer and Devon Payne-Sturges
University of Maryland, University of Maryland
strike

COVER STORY The Supreme Court’s reversal of the Chevron doctrine follows a series of recent judicial curve balls and a long-term barrage of anti-regulatory pitches. EPA can still score hits powered by statutory mandates, while environmentalists come up with a new game plan.

By Eric Schaeffer
Environmental Integrity Project

With SIDEBARs from firm lawyer Susan Bodine and sustainability professor Stan Meiburg

Katie Dykes

PROFILE As commissioner of Connecticut’s combined Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Katie Dykes is able to apply an interdisciplinary approach that allows the state to address challenges in a holistic way, leveraging one policy to optimize another.

By Akielly Hu
Contributing Editor
The Debate: The New Toxic Substances Control Act Is Now Five Years Old: A Report

THE DEBATE Less than a decade has passed since enactment of the Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, the first time the Toxic Substances Control Act was amended since the original law was passed 40 years earlier. Welcomed with broad enthusiasm, the 2016 amendments were intended to correct a number of TSCA’s shortcomings. But has the new law worked as expected? Or, as critics have since argued, is it time to consider new amendments because implementation of the 2016 act has revealed significant flaws?

By Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp, Daniel Rosenberg, Michal Freedhoff, Kimberly Wise White and David Fischer
Environmental Protection Network, Natural Resources Defense Council, EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, American Chemistry Council, Keller and Heckman, L.L.P.
By: David P. Clarke

Federal Actions Spark Optimism About New Momentum for Grid.

By: Craig M. Pease

Earth’s Climate Sensitivity and Related Institutional Sensitivity.

By: Linda K. Breggin

Will State and Local Governments Put the Kibosh on Geoengineering?

By: Stephen R. Dujack

The Atmosphere Has Protected Us. But Today, We Need to Protect It.

By: Ethan Shenkman

Loper Bright and Corner Post May Create a “Tsunami” of Litigation.

By: Bethany A. Davis Noll

At End of Term, Court Pummels Agencies in Four Landmark Cases

By: Joseph E. Aldy

Significant Methane Abatement Potential in Oil-and-Gas Sector.

By: Bruce Rich

Of Big Bank Net-Zero Lending and Phantom Carbon Offsets

By: G. Tracy Mehan III

Evaluates Efficacy of Private Governance.

By: ELI Staff

See Colleagues' Job Changes and Honors Received.

By: Nick Collins

ELI helps sponsor gathering of peacebuilders in The Hague.

By: Jarryd Page

An Opportunity for Rethinking Environmental Protection.